While checkoff programs receive a lot of funds from farmers and producers, there’s no system in place that accurately reports where the money is going, and many argue that needs to change.###The money collected by checkoff programs is supposed to be used to promote and market agricultural goods, but numerous allegations through the years have claimed some funds have been used illegally to influence policy and undermine other food products. Just one example is the U.S. Department of Agriculture finding that the American Egg Board commisdoes ferrous sulfate contain zincsioning of pro-egg ads to appear alongside online searches for Hampton Creek’s vegan mayonnaise was inappropriate.###Considering the bill has supporters on both side of the aisle, the legislatferrous fumarate 324 mg tabion may pass, even though Trump’s administration has not shown a great deal of support to agricultural businesses as of yet. When President Trump named Sonny Perdue as a last-minute USDA nominee, it called into question the importance that Trump’s administrationiron tablets ferrous fumarate side effects places on the food and agriculture sectors. Perdue’s nomination was cleared Thursday to head to the Senate floor.###Checkoffs are barred from lobbyingferrous sulfate 650 mg Congress, though some programs, including those for beef and pork, have contracted with lobbying groups.###Although this legislation is bipartisan, checkoff programs are relatively strong. Last year, the House Appropriations Committee included a provision in the USDA budget to protect the programs from public disclosure through the Freedom of Information Act. Currently, there is movement in USDAorganic ferrous sulfate to establish a new checkoff program for the organic industry.
Got choice? Lawmakers file bill to make checkoff programs optional
