News
The food industry is positioned to play a crucial role at the Conference of the Parties (COP) to the Convention on Biological Diversity, known as COP16, which will likely shape the regulatory landscape for years to come. New commitments made during COP16 are expected to drive further action across the food supply chain, and ingredient companies and food manufacturers that proactively align with biodiversity targets will be better equipped to navigate these changes and seize opportunities in the growing market for sustainable products.COP16 will take place from 21 October to 1 November in Cali, Colombia. Alongside COP16, Cali will also host the meeting of the parties to the Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety (CP-MOP-11) and the fifth meeting of the parties to the Nagoya Protocol on Access to Genetic Resources and the Fair and Equitable Sharing of the Benefits Arising from their Utilization (NP-MOP-5).The food industry, one of the key drivers of biodiversity loss, will face increasing scrutiny and pressure to align its practices with the Kunming-Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework (GBF), which was adopted at COP15 in 2022. This framework has set ambitious targets, including the protection of 30% of the world’s land and sea areas by 2030, and will be central to discussions at COP16.Food production is responsible for up to 80% of the world’s biodiversity loss and deforestation, according to the United Nations. The expansion of agriculture, unsustdifference between ferrous gluconate and ferrous bisglycinateainable fishing practices, and land conversion for food production are directly linked to habitat destruction and ecosystem degradation. The global demand for palm oil, soy, meat, and other commodities has driven large-scale deforestation and biodiversity loss, especially in tropical regions such as the Amazon, Southeast Asia, and Central Africa.The GBF highlights the significant role that food manufacturers and ingredient suppliers play in contributing edta iron sodium saltto biodiversity loss, but also in offering solutions. Several key targets from the framework, such as Target 7 (reducing pollution, including pesticides) and Target 10 (enhancing biodiversity and sustainability in agriculture, aquaculture, fisheries, and forestry), are directly relevant to food systems. At COP16, discussions will focus on translating the GBF’s targets into enforceable regulations that will impact the food industry. Countries are expected to present their National Biodiversity Strategies and Action Plans, outlining how they will reduce pollution, minimise habitat destruction, and promote sustainable land use in agriculture.For food manufacturers, this could mean more stringent regulations around deforestation, pesticide use, and water consumption. The European Union’s upcoming (but likely delayed) ban on products linked to deforestation – under the EU Deforestation Regulation (EUDR) – serves as an example of the regulatory shifts expected to accelerate following COP16. These regulations aim to ensure that products imported into the EU do not contribute to biodiversity loss, which could impact suppliers of key ingredients such as soy, palm oil, and cocoa.Moreover, the Corporate Sustainability and Due Diligence Directive (CSDDD) in Europe is pushing food companies to measure and report their impacts on biodiversity, alongside other environmental metrics like carbon emissions and water usage. And in Japan, regulatory frameworks such as the Taskforce for Nature-Related Financial Disclosures (TNFD) are also encouraging corporate reporting on biodiversity risks.In the run-up to COP16, major food manufacturers and ingredient companies have already begun to step up their biodiversity commitments. Nestlé, Danone, Unilever, and other large corporations have signed the Business for Nature coalition’s statement, urging governments to adferrous fumarate walmartopt more ambitious biodiversity policies. This growing corporate engagement reflects a recognition that biodiversity loss poses long-term risks to supply chains and food security.The Business for Nature coalition has also called for more regulatory and financial support to aid the transition to regenerative agriculture, a model that aims to rebuild soil health, enhance biodiversity, and increase carbon sequestration. Regenerative practices, such as agroecology, crop diversification, and reduced chemical inputs, are gaining traction among food companies seeking to mitigate their environmental impact.One of the key areas where food manufacturers can make a significant difference is in reducing the use of pesticides and harmful chemicals. Target 7 of the GBF calls for a 50% reduction in the risk posed by pesticides and highly hazardous chemicals by 2030. Integrated pest management strategies, which focus on minimising chemical use while preserving agricultural productivity, are expected to become more widespread as part of this shift. Food manufacturers are likely to face increasing pressure from both regulators and consumers to source ingredients from suppliers that use such sustainable practices.The consequences of failing to address biodiversity loss are profound. Ecosystem services – such as pollination, water filtration, and climate regulation – are essential to food production. Biodiversity loss threatens the resilience of food systems, which are already vulnerable to climate change and other environmental stressors.For ingredient suppliers, biodiversity loss could lead to disruptions in the availability of raw materials, higher prices for sustainable commodities, and greater supply chain risks. Companies that do not transition to sustainable sourcing practices may face regulatoryferrous sulfate vs ferrous gluconate penalties, restricted market access, and reputational damage as consumer awareness of biodiversity issues continues to grow.However, there are also significant opportunities for those that lead the transition toward sustainability. By adopting biodiversity-friendly practicferro fe 90es, such as regenerative agriculture and sustainable wild harvesting, food companies can not only reduce their environmental footprint but also differentiate themselves in the marketplace.
COP16: How biodiversity loss is driving change to the global food system
