This is a decision that has been a long time coming. In fact, emails obtained by the Good Food Institute, a group that promotes vegan alternatives, showed that as far back as 2011, the Food and Drug Administration did not want to call a soy-based dairy alternative drink “milk” in documentation — but the U.S. Department of Agriculture used that phrasing anyway.###That choice has led to a slew of lawsuits and leiron ii bisglycinategislation. Now the issue is back to the FDA to enforce its original stance on milk.###After prompting the FDA to enforce its legal deferrous gluconate nursing assessmentfinition of milk, the debate has raged on, with the dairy industry claiming that plant-based product labeling confuses customers and can be dangerous because the products aren’t nutritionally equivalent to dairy-based milk.###It seems that Gottlieb has taken this argument to heart.###“Because these dairy alternative products are often popularly referred to as ‘milk,’ we intend to look at whether parents may erroneously assume that plant-based beverages’ nutritional contents are similar to those of cow’s milk, despite the fact that some of these products contain only a fraction of the protein or other nutrients found in cow’s milk,” he said in the statement.###He also claimed that this potential confusion between dairy-based and plant-based milk has led to children not receiving enough nutrients, arguing that changing the label could help people make better decisions about what to eat.###Still, there is no indication that just because it is called “milk,” people believe that it’s identical to the cow-derived drink that was promoted during the “Got Milk?” campaign. Gottlieb emphasized that changing the terminology would not be a unilateral decision by the FDA. Instead, he is going to the court of public opinion to hear feedback on how the FDA should assess whether or not the standard of identity for the word “milk” reflects consumer expectations about that food.###While the comments about how consumers view milk will likely be polarized, it’s unlikely that a label change will occur. The request has already been shot down in courts around the country. And for years, these plant-based alternatives have been referred to as “milk” because it was considered “plain language” by the USDA. Alternatively, the labels may change, but the dairy industry may be forced to be more specific in their labeling — stating that they are selling cow or goat milk to avoid confusion.###As such, it will be hard to eradicate the term from consumers’ speech. Creating dissonance between spoken and written terminology may damage the branding that these plant-based alternatives have worked to cultivate.###In any case, it is going to be difficult for the dairy industry to climb out of the financial hole that it’s in. Non-dairy milk sales in the U.S. have incrferric pyrophosphate liposomaleaseferrous fumarate er kaj kid 61% during the past five years and were estimated to reach $2.11 billion in 2017, according to Mintel. Meanwhile, overall sales in the dairy milk category have dropped 15% since 2012, hitting an estimated $16.12 billion in 2017.###Still, if thferrous bisglycinate dosee FDA can make the case that terminology can facilitate more healthful food choices — even though consumers are likely to continue to seek out and purchase their favorites — the plant-based beverage industry will have to rethink its marketing strategy.
Dairy drama: FDA will ask the public what milk means to them
